Thursday, January 21, 2010

More on Denying the Self in Evangelical Thinking, and Happiness

In the picture at the left is one of thousands of dwelling caves found in the Mustang region of Nepal. In these caves were found many very old manuscripts as well as murals and homes. One of the things that struck me the most, and I couldn't find a photo of it, is a tiny cave (about the size of a large bathtub) that was sealed off except for a small passage. The passage turned at 90 degree angles that would block all light from the outside world.

Since this ritual is still practiced by devoted Buddhist in the region, we know how those caves were/are used. The devoted pilgrim will come there, crawl back into the cave and stay . . . for weeks or months in total dark isolation. A family member would bring them bland food, such enough to keep them alive, and water. That family member was not allowed to make any verbal or visual contact with the pilgrim.

The point in all of this is an deeper spiritual experience by a complete denial of the self. But Buddhism is very dualistic religion, in which this physical world is seen as a hindrance, at best, to the spiritual world and thus human desire is in opposition to spiritual enlightenment.

I have a sense that some forms of Christianity has taken this non-Biblical approach to denying the self. For example, many sects throughout the medieval period saw the universe in this light. Church history tells us of many monks who sought total isolation from the world and from all human desires.

In the verse that I included in the previous post about this topic, scripture seems to suggest some type of denial of self.

This blog is of course not meant to be a source of great Biblical teaching. At best it is the musings of a not so bright, lay person who is trying to figure things out for himself. In other words, even if I were teaching a Sunday school class on this topic, I would have spent hours in Biblical research. But at best, I have had that passage and my thoughts about that passage on the back burner of my mind in the last few days.

I think that passage makes sense if you put it into its historical context. Jesus was about to be crucified. The entire Christian empire rested on the shoulders of those eleven men (plus faithful bystanders). Soon the whole army would bear down on those individuals, most of whole would be martyred. So the issue was do they, in the face of danger, give up, go home and deny the faith.

I could see the same issue coming up today (if we lived in a fictitious futuristic world) where a Fascist government wanted to kill all the American Christians. Now I say this tongue n cheek, but I do now Evangelicals who are convinced that this scenario is just around the corner.

But in that fictitious world, I can imagine how, if we wanted the faith to continue, that we would have to suffer, giving up our instincts for survival and denying our selves . . . potentially facing grave harm.

But in closing of this post, my real question is whether or not if this concept of self-denial has been taken out of context and influenced by Dualistic thinking to the point that it really becomes a burden to many and even a possible tool of manipulation.

3 comments:

JKF said...

I was under the impression that denial of self was central to being a Christian. This denial of self though wasn't a denial of the physical world or adopting an pleasure-free lifestyle, but instead a denial of ambitions, pride, and self-justification and replacing our self-identify with an identifying with Jesus.

By doing this our self denial doesn't become a quest for blocking out the light of the sun, but instead a denial of our sinful attempts to find justification without Jesus which leads to freedom.

Anonymous said...

I think it means denial of self in the CONTEXT of living a life that places the needs of others on par with the needs of self.

Denial of self, as in the practice of the fruit of the Spirit, which are all fruits that are geared towards how we treat and think about others.

The fruit of the Spirit, to me, provides a much better defining context for "self-denial" than a lot of the things I've heard.

And...yes...shame, humiliation, condemnation...these are some of the major tools of the trade for some (not all, but certainly some) Christian leaders.

Shame works...it certainly provokes some to action... But, like when God was choosing David over his better looking and more mature brothers, God doesn't always care about "what works." On the outside, condemnation can produce a church full of worker bees, but so were the Pharisees, and Jesus didn't have a lot of positive words to say about them.

Former Pastor's Wife

Anonymous said...

I could see the same issue coming up today (if we lived in a fictitious futuristic world) where a Fascist government wanted to kill all the American Christians. Now I say this tongue n cheek, but I do now Evangelicals who are convinced that this scenario is just around the corner.

And "Near-Future Persecution Dystopias" are as overdone in Christian attempts at SF as "Elves, Dwarves, etc" are in Fantasy trilogies. The only one to try an original tack recently was Frank Creed's Flashpoint which experimented with Christian Cyberpunk, but even Flashpoint did homage to End Time Prophecy with its Cyberpunk One World State (TM).